SHOULD COUNTRIES FIRE SELL THEIR OIL & GAS ASSETS? ADDRESSING THE MIS-CONCEPTIONS SURROUNDING THE CONTINUED ROLE OF FOSSIL FUELS IN THE ENERGY TRANSITION ERA

Victoria R Nalule 1

Xiaoyi (Shawn) MU 2

INTRODUCTION

Access to modern energy such as electricity is key in the economic development of any country, and yet over 600 million people remain with no access to electricity in developing countries. It is true that both renewable energy and fossil fuels are key in the achievement of the United Nations Sustainable Development (UN SDG) Goal 7 and Goal 1 on energy access and poverty eradication respectively. However, the current global efforts to transition to a low carbon economy, and tackle climate change as stipulated in the SDG 13 and the 2015 Paris Agreement, have created a lot of tension on fossil fuel developments in recent years. This commentary article is presented as a question and answer session aimed at addressing the misconceptions surrounding the achievement of SDG 7 and SDG 13 in this energy transition era. The paper is of interest to oil producing countries. The article follows the various questions raised by policymakers during an online seminar delivered by both the authors entitled, ‘Fossil Fuels in the Energy Transition Era’.

Keywords: Energy Access; Climate Change; Energy Transitions; clean energy technology: Sustainable Development

DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4314/jsdlp.v11i2.7

1 Victoria R. Nalule holds a PhD in International Energy Law and Policy from the Centre for Energy, Petroleum and Mineral Law and Policy (CEPMLP), University of Dundee. She is currently working on the DFID-funded Extractives Hub project in the UK as a Research Fellow. She is also the founder and Executive Director of the African Energy and Minerals Management Initiative (AEMI).

2 Dr. Xiaoyi (Shawn) Mu is a Reader in Energy Economics at the Centre for Energy, Petroleum and Mineral Law and Policy (CEPMLP), the University of Dundee. He earned his Ph.D. in economics from the University of Oklahoma in 2006 and Bachelor’s degree in economics from Renmin University of China in 1994.

TOWARDS INNOVATIVE TEACHING PEDAGOGIES IN GENDER RESEARCH: A REVIEW OF A GENDER RESEARCH METHODS CLASS

Oludayo Olorunfemi

INTRODUCTION

This commentary examines the teaching of research methods in Women and Gender Studies in the Gender Studies Unit of the Institute of African Studies, University of Ibadan. It interrogates how the course has increased the awareness of students in the methods of conducting research and how the research they conduct has implications on marginalized populations. The course also highlights the need for a growing body of knowledge that engages the experience of black women in Africa and the African diaspora. The course draws the attention of students to the agency of women through the reading and teaching of various research methods in Gender Studies. An ethnographic approach is adopted using participant observation in the course covering a period of one semester. Also, a critical perspective is applied in discussing the particular epistemological standpoint deployed by the course instructor. In other words, the black feminist epistemology serves as an important strategy for increasing global-minded consciousness of how a course in gender research methods engages the agency of black women using Hip Hop pedagogy.

Keywords: Gender Research Methods, Black Feminist Epistemology, Global-Minded, Black Consciousness, African Feminism.

DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4314/jsdlp.v11i2.11

Gender Studies Unit, Institute of African Studies, University of Ibadan, Email: oludeester@gmail.com Phone No: 08061397690.

THE JUDICIARY AND SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT: PERSPECTIVES OF A BRAZILIAN FEDERAL JUDGE

Gabriel Wedy*

ABSTRACT

The approval of 17 goals and 169 targets for sustainable development by the United Nations Conference on Post-2015 Development Agenda is unquestionably an advancement for humanity. Economic development alone is however unsatisfactory: it must be paired with human development, respect for the environment and sound governance. Drawing from litigation and jurisprudential development from the Brazilian judiciary, this short legal commentary evaluates the role of the judiciary in promoting sustainable development, especially the attainment of the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Keywords: Brazil, Sustainable Development, Judiciary.

Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4314/jsdlp.v6i2.10

---

* Federal Judge in Brazil, an Environmental Law Professor at ESMAFE/RS (the Federal Judiciary Superior School) and a Visiting Scholar at Columbia Law School(Sabin Center for Climate Change Law).

INTERNATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL GOVERNANCE: LESSONS FROM UNEA AND PERSPECTIVES ON THE POST-2015 ERA

Joseph Nyangon*

ABSTRACT

The inaugural meeting of the United Nations Environment Assembly (UNEA) held in June 2014 in Nairobi, was a culmination of more than four decades of environmental governance since the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) was established in 1972 in Stockholm. The meeting addressed weighty and contentious issues including strengthening of UNEP’s role in promoting environmental governance and enhancing science-policy interface. Yet despite the historical significance of the meeting following universalization of the governing body of UNEP and current debates on the post-2015 development agenda, questions persist about the role of UNEP, its establishment, performance, and fragmentation of programmes and secretariats of the multilateral environmental agreements associated with it. This paper reviews the outcome of the inaugural UNEA session, while developing a political economy account of institutional arrangements of international environmental governance to clarify the potential for, and barriers to effective environmental reform. Multilaterally, international environmental governance continues to exhibit elements of complexity, fragmentation, lack of coordination as well as redundancy. In more critical terms, lack of policy integration between environmental regimes is a concern of environmental governance that the new UNEA should address as a matter of priority. Furthermore, incoherent policy objectives in international environmental law often characterised as a governance patchwork have been criticized for their economic orthodoxies that only serve to marginalize and delegitimize alternative modes of environmental governance. In this regard, a core part of UNEA’s institutional legitimacy depends on its success in coevolving to keep up with environmental challenges as they themselves change, as well as enhancing consensus-based stakeholder engagement, perspectives, and participation on environmental governance. This will be its true litmus test on how it responds coherently and effectively to international environmental governance in a post-2015 development world.

Keywords: International environmental governance, institutional arrangements, UNEA, political economy, fragmentation, SDGs, post-2015 goals

---

* Joseph Nyangon, Ph.D. Researcher, Center for Energy and Environmental Policy (CEEP), University of Delaware, U.S.A., jnyangon@udel.edu.

THE PROSPECTS AND CHALLENGES OF THE PROPOSED CARBON TAX REGIME IN SOUTH AFRICA: LESSONS FROM THE NIGERIAN EXPERIENCE

Gbenga Akinwande*

ABSTRACT One of the policy instruments canvassed for the reduction of greenhouse gases (GHGs) is carbon tax. Carbon tax- an economic instrument which levies taxes on the carbon content of goods and services, is increasingly getting popular among policy makers worldwide. South Africa is one of the countries with advanced plans to adopt carbon tax as a way of reducing and discouraging the emission of GHGs. This paper analyses the proposed carbon tax in the light of South Africa’s commitment under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). What lessons can South Africa learn from a similar environmental tax regime previously adopted in Nigeria?

Keywords: Carbon Tax, South Africa, Nigeria, GHGs, United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change

A REVIEW OF THE KEY PROVISIONS OF THE PETROLEUM INDUSTRY BILL AND THE IMPLICATIONS ON DEREGULATION

Olutumbi Abiodun Babayomi*

ABSTRACT

For many years, Nigeria has been classified globally as a fitting illustration of a nation suffering from the resource curse problem. This is because after decades of oil production, many parts of Nigeria have little or nothing to show in terms of social, environmental and economic development. In a bid to break loose from the resource curse classification, attempts have been made to upgrade the Nigerian oil and gas legal framework in order to boost real growth and development. The proposed legislation, the Petroleum Industry Bill (PIB), is currently under legislative consideration and represents the most comprehensive review of the legal framework for the oil and gas sector in Nigeria since the industry began commercial operations in the 1960s. It could signal the dawn of a new era; an era in which restructuring and transformation could address many of the issues that have dominated the oil and gas industry in Sub-saharan Africa’s second-biggest economy. However, despite its radical promises, the PIB has constantly met a brick wall at the National Assembly. It then comes to question the reasons for this delay. If the proposed bill will do more harm than good to the country, why then has it been ingloriously delayed? This paper x-rays and reviews the potential contributions and key provisions of the PIB amongst other things for the stability and growth of the Nigerian oil and gas industry. It also comments on why the current brick wall facing the PIB must be rapidly addressed.

Keywords: Oil, Gas, Petroleum Industry Bill, Deregulation

---

* Final Year Law Student (LL.B Candidate), College of Law, Afe Babalola University, Ado Ekiti, Nigeria.