GENDER EQUALITY AND SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT: EVALUATING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF NIGERIAN LAWS AND PRACTICES TO GUARANTEE THE WOMAN’S HUMAN RIGHT

Oluwakemi Odeyinde

INTRODUCTION

In light of the prevalence of discriminatory practices and violence against women, gender equality has been internationally recognized as one of the sustainable development goals to be achieved by state parties before the year 2030. However, achieving equality between men and women has been the greatest human right issue in Nigeria. The main aim of this article is to show that women are important in promoting sustainable development. However there are provisions of the Nigerian law which discriminate against a woman. This article argues that sections 221, 353, 357 and 360 of the Criminal Code and sections 55, 282(2) of the Penal Code discriminate against a girl or woman. In addition, although Nigeria is a party to a number of international treaties such as CEDAW, gender discrimination remains a major threat to sustainable development. The limited number of women appointed in the senate shows the extent of marginalization of women in Nigeria. For example, the United Nations rating of Nigeria in human development is low due to the fact that the percentage of seats held by women in parliament is so minimal compared to the men. Therefore the findings of this article are to assist policymakers in enforcing sustainable practices that promote gender equality by among other things, amending the relevant provisions of the criminal code and the penal code which discriminates against a female in Nigeria. Finally, to reconsider bringing back the gender equality bill that was rejected for second reading in 2015 at the floor of the senate.

Keywords: Gender equality, discrimination, sustainable development, human rights

DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4314/jsdlp.v12i2.10

Oluwakemi Odeyinde, LLM (UNILAG) BL (UI) is a Law Lecturer II, Centre for Foundation Education, Bells University of Technology Ota, Ogun State, Nigeria. E-MAIL: kemiodeyinde@gmail.com: 08178312706, 08056682060

EQUATOR PRINCIPLES 4-REVISED CLIMATE CHANGE RISK: WHAT DOES THIS MEAN FOR PROJECT FINANCING IN AFRICA AMIDST THE ONGOING ENERGY TRANSITION?

Ailly P.G Sheehama

INTRODUCTION

Since its inception, the Equator Principles Association introduced a risk management framework in response to the ever-changing environmental and social risk in projects. The Equator Principles (EPs) result from minimum standards for risk management to stop the race to the bottom. In June 2013, EP3 was introduced, and climate change requirements were added to address the 'transition towards an ethical and lowcarbon economy.'1 This eventually led to the newly revised Equator Principles 4 (EP4s), 'Climate Change Risk Assessment' (transition risk), in July 2020. This article analyses the effect of the transition risk of EP4 to determine whether this new addition will support or inhibit oil and gas project financing in Africa amidst the ongoing energy transition by questioning the underlying assumptions upon which the policy design was developed. The article concluded that consideration for project financing in Africa could be expected to address the energy needs in Africa while at the same time essentially pushing governments to take into consideration climate change by putting in place processes, policies, and systems to manage these risks.'2 Furthermore, the transition risks definition and implementing standards of EP4 are broadly worded, allowing adapting the principles to a wide range of regimes that positively contribute to these domains. This essentially enables consideration of ethical transition and provides for coordination and coherence across different policy domains.

Keywords: Climate change; Equator principles; Corporate social responsibility; Business and human rights; Risk assessment.

DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4314/jsdlp.v12i1.4

Ailly Sheehama, BA Law (Namibia), MA International Oil and Gas Law and Policy (Scotland), Deputy Country Director (Namibia), African Energy & Minerals Management Initiative (AEMI). Email: aillysheehama@gmail.com

“HUMANIZING” INVESTMENTS IN THE EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES IN AFRICA THROUGH THE IFC’S SUSTAINABILITY POLICIES

Chairman Okoloise

INTRODUCTION

International financial institutions face enormous challenges in Emerging Markets and Developing Economies (EMDEs). They finance infrastructure projects, manage vast investment portfolios, offer advisory services, and contribute to economic development in EMDEs. In the process, they are exposed to huge risks and face reputational damage if they act recklessly or have little or no regard for their projects’ adverse impacts on third parties. In the context of natural resource exploitation in Africa, the weak governance of environmental and social risks often results in devastating consequences for communities proximate to investment projects. Promises of infrastructure and social services, job opportunities and economic boom have only often delivered land grabs, forced displacement, cultural infringements, environmental pollution, conflicts, health disasters, misery and sometimes deaths. As calls for greater corporate scrutiny increase, investment project facilitators in the extractive industries like the International Finance Corporation (IFC) must respond appropriately. To preserve its reputation and long-term market access, the IFC needs to apply a higher degree of due diligence and sustainable business conduct that proactively treat risks and limit its exposure. With the rising number of complaints against IFC policy compliance, including projects tainted by scandals and the debarment of companies from accessing international finance, this article demonstrates that merely promoting sustainable investment policies on paper is inadequate. Using a human rights-centred approach to development project financing, the article critically assesses the extent to which the implementation of the IFC’s sustainability framework can practicably protect resource-rich communities, safeguard human rights and ensure sustainable development outcomes in Africa.

Keywords: Extractive Industries, Human rights, Project Financing, IFC, Compliance, Sustainable Development.

DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4314/jsdlp.v11i2.6

DAAD (German Academic Exchange) Doctor of Laws Candidate, Centre for Human Rights, University of Pretoria, South Africa. LLB (Ambrose Alli), BL (Nigeria), LLM (Pretoria), Dip (Åbo Akademi); Dip (Copenhagen). Email: chairmanokoloise@yahoo.com

LARGE-SCALE LAND ACQUISITION AND HUMAN RIGHTS AT THE CROSSROADS: QUEST FOR A RIGHTS-BASED APPROACH TO LAND ADMINISTRATION IN ETHIOPIA

Abiyot Mogos Dabala*

ABSTRACT

Large-scale land investment through a form of forceful acquisition, dubbed “land grabbing”, is a perennial concern for local community and indigenous peoples in Africa, particularly in Ethiopia. This article explores the human rights impacts of such large-scale land acquisition in Ethiopia and discusses ways of ameliorating its effects. It demonstrates how large- scale land acquisition in the country undermines substantive rights of the local and indigenous peoples, including land rights, right to food, development, culture, self-determination, labour rights, environmental rights, as well as their procedural right to public participation, prior informed consent, access to information and justice, all of which are recognized under international instruments, and the constitution of the Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia (FDRE). The article advocates for a human rights-based approach to large-scale land acquisition regime that respects and integrates the aforementioned substantive and procedural rights of local and indigenous peoples. This also involves government’s obligation to implement effective human right impact assessment, efficient monitoring, evaluation, dispute resolution mechanism, and empowering local community and other stakeholders to safeguard the rights of affected community. By so doing, the country

---

* LL.B, LL.M in International Economic and Business Law from Haramaya University, Ethiopia; Lecturer of Law at Mettu University, Ethiopia and can be reached at abiyot00@gmail.com

LINKING THE SDGS WITH HUMAN RIGHTS: OPPORTUNITIES AND CHALLENGES OF PROMOTING GOAL 17

Wekgari Dulume*

ABSTRACT

The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development is grounded in different international human rights instruments. Human rights (HR) principles and standards are strongly reflected in several of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and targets. Furthermore, SDG 17 emphasizes partnership as a key to achieving all of the SDGs. This article examines the SDGs-HR linkage in general, as well as specific HR principles that can be advanced by the achievement of SDG 17. Opportunities and challenges to promote Goal 17 of the SDGs that directly affect certain HRs are also examined. A review of relevant literature, 2030 summit documents, and outcomes of recent international conferences on the SDGs is undertaken in order to determine the progress made towards forging regional and global partnerships for the SDGs, as envisaged in Goal 17. This article finds that the absence of a political will and commitment, increased isolationist policy, narrow nationalism and poor rule linkage at national and international levels are some of the obstacles to the attainment of Goal 17. Yet, opportunities abound to promote the Goal. The article recommends a genuine commitment to implementing the SDGs by encouraging the South-South and North-South to prevent the SDGs from becoming a mere wishlist. Synergy between the government, individuals, civil society organizations (CSOs) and transnational corporations (TNCs) is equally very important.

Keywords: Human rights, sustainable development goals, partnership for the goals.

DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4314/jsdlp.v10i1.3

* LL.B, LL.M, Member of the Editorial Committee, Oromia Law Journal, Senior Legal Researcher at Oromia Justice Sector Professionals Training and Legal Research Institute, Ethiopia. Email: wekgaridulume@yahoo.com

RECONCILING HUMAN RIGHTS AND THE ENVIRONMENT: A PROPOSAL TO INTEGRATE THE RIGHT TO FOOD WITH SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT IN THE 2030 DEVELOPMENT AGENDA

Ana García Juanatey*

ABSTRACT

This article examines the utility of the human rights-based approach (HRBA) in tackling environmental challenges that face achievement of the right to food in coming decades. So far, such approach has been quite useful in the consideration of equity, discrimination and accountability issues. Nevertheless, the HRBA’s utility to tackle the effects of environmental degradation, natural resources depletion and climate change on food security is not that clear, as human rights law and practice has evolved in parallel with environmental concerns until recently. Therefore, this article poses the following question: is the human rights-based approach to food security sufficient to address the environmental problems and constraints that infringe directly on the right to food implementation? And, how can we integrate the needs of future generations in current human rights-based policies and deal with the tradeoffs between present and future needs? This article examines how last years’ international legal literature has portrayed the linkages between the environment and human rights, principally in relation to the right to food. Moreover, it also intends to explore possible avenues of convergence, pinpointing opportunities to connect the right to food and sustainable development in the context of the 2030 Agenda. In more concrete terms, it suggests that a greater integration between the right to food and a set of principles of sustainable development law may open new avenues for research and advocacy on the right to food.

Keywords: Human Rights, Environment, Right to Food, Human RightsBased Approach, Sustainable Development, Sustainable Development Law

DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4314/jsdlp.v9i1.2

---

* PhD (Universitat Pompeu Fabra), Visiting Professor at Universitat Pompeu Fabra and Research Fellow at Institut Barcelona d’Estudis Internacionals (IBEI). This article is based on the research conducted at the Food and Agricultural Organization (FAO) between January and March 2015. I thank Juan Carlos García Cebolla and the rest of the Right to Food Team for their warm welcome and help during that period. Part of the views reflected in this article are included too in my PhD thesis entitled, “An Integrated Approach of the Right to Food and Food Security in the Framework of Sustainable Development” (Universitat Pompeu Fabra, 2016), supervised by Professor Ángel J. Rodrigo Hernández.

INCLUSIVE DEVELOPMENT AS AN IMPERATIVE TO REALIZING THE HUMAN RIGHT TO WATER AND SANITATION

Pedi Obani* and Joyeeta Gupta**

ABSTRACT

There are a plethora of governance instruments for operationalizing human rights obligations on water and sanitation at multiple levels of governance. The realization that the human right to water and sanitation depends on the discourses and approaches used in a country to implement it implies that it is not self-evident that implementing the right will lead to inclusive development. The inclusive development aims at not only social inclusion but also ecological and relational inclusion, where the latter aims at ensuring that the structural causes of inequality are also addressed. Relying on an extensive literature review and jurisprudence on the human right to water and sanitation, we develop an ideal-typical conceptual framework for assessing the human right to water and sanitation with inclusive development as an imperative. Our framework is based on the premise that governance instruments are value-laden tools which can steer social changes depending on the contextual political paradigm which can be garnered from the goals, ownership models, accountability mechanisms and incentives of actors involved in the governance process. We, therefore, propose a simple model for assessing whether the governance instruments for operationalizing the human right to water and sanitation will, in fact, lead to inclusive development.

Keywords: Human Rights, Governance, Water and Sanitation

DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4314/jsdlp.v8i2.4

---

* Lecturer I, Department of Public Law, Faculty of Law, University of Benin, Benin City, Nigeria; PhD Research Fellow at the University of Amsterdam and the UNIHE Institute for Water Education, The Netherlands. Email: pedi.obani@gmail.com; pedi.obani@uniben.edu. ** Professor of Environment and Development in the Global South at the Amsterdam Institute for Social Science Research of the University of Amsterdam and UN-IHE Institute for Water Education, The Netherlands. This article is based on ongoing PhD research and supervision financed by the NUFFIC Netherlands Fellowship Professional Project No. CF 162/2012 for which the authors are very grateful.

DISTRIBUTIVE JUSTICE AND HUMAN RIGHTS IN CLIMATE POLICY: THE LONG ROAD TO PARIS

Idowu Ajibade*

ABSTRACT

The Paris Agreement, adopted by 196 countries, is the first global climate change instrument to explicitly reference human rights as a guiding principle. The treaty does not expound on the implications of climate change for human rights but the fact that it calls on State Parties to respect human rights when combating climate change shows a significant improvement in international thinking and acceptance of the linkages between human rights and climate change. Indeed, this is no mean feat. The journey to Paris has been a long and arduous process, especially for the broad coalition of indigenous people, gender, human rights, environmental and climate justice groups that worked tirelessly to bring the issue to global focus. My goal in this article is to explore the implications of a human rights clause in the Paris Agreement. Does it carry any legal or political weight? Are State Parties likely to operationalize it? In what ways can they enforce this part of the Agreement? To answer these questions, this article traces the historical account of the connections between human rights and climate change within the United Nations system and examines issues of equity and distributive justice in international climate change frameworks such as the UNFCCC, Kyoto Protocol, and the Paris Agreement. The article expounds on opportunities for integrating human rights-based approaches into national and international climate policy and concludes on the need for further integration of both issues in future research and treaty negotiations.

Keywords: Climate change, human rights, justice, policy, Paris Agreement

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.4314/jsdlp.v7i2.4

---

* Postdoctoral Fellow, Balsillie School of International Affairs, Waterloo, Canada. jajibade@balsillieschool.ca.

THE FEASIBILITY OF IMPLEMENTING THE UNITED NATIONS GUIDING PRINCIPLES ON BUSINESS AND HUMAN RIGHTS IN THE EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRY IN NIGERIA

Oyeniyi Abe*

ABSTRACT

Extractive resource governance has been a challenging task for resource-rich countries in Africa. It has fuelled civil wars, ethnic clashes and underdevelopment in this region. This has turned the so-called resource wealth into resource curse. To address this particularly nauseating challenge, the international community came together to adopt the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights (GPs). Polarised debate on whether the GPs should be binding or voluntary has slowed down the effective implementation of the Principles. This article argues that while the GPs have been the latest attempt at regulating multinational companies (MNCs), greater emphasis should be placed on the readiness of states to domesticate the Principles. To achieve this, the paper explores various approaches through which the GPs can be crafted into national legislation. It also investigates the different methods through which states can ensure that corporations systemically respect human rights obligations in their areas of operation. In order to restore faith in the whole process, it is necessary to examine how human rights principles can be mainstreamed into corporate practice locally. No doubt, rights-based frameworks, such as the GPs, are needed to ensure that human rights are streamlined in business’ projects, policies, and agreements throughout the various stages, including preparation, funding, implementation and monitoring. The issue of corporate liability under international law has had its troubled history, thus, this article argues that MNCs have a heightened responsibility to respect the human rights of the local communities in resourcerich, war-torn zones, particularly in sub-Saharan African, using Nigeria as focal point.

Keywords: Guiding principles, business, human rights, multinational companies (MNCs).

Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4314/jsdlp.v6i2.7

---

* Doctoral Candidate, Centre for Comparative Law, Faculty of Law, University of Cape Town, South Africa, currently Fulbright Visiting Scholar at Loyola University, Chicago School of Law. oabe@luc.edu.

THE EFFECTS OF LEGISLATION ON CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY IN THE MINERALS AND MINES SECTOR OF NIGERIA

Adedoyin Akinsulore*

ABSTRACT

This paper examines the effect of legislation on the corporate social responsibility in the minerals and mines sector of the Nigerian economy. Observing that the extractive industry sector in the country is populated by enclave industries that give little priority to CSR, the paper analyses the Nigerian Minerals and Mines Act, 2007. The Act obligates contracting a Community Development Agreement (CDA) between the mineral title holder and the community where the mining company is to operate. Linking CSR and the CDA through the stakeholder theory, the paper observes that corporate actors in the solid minerals sector of the country can no longer deprioritise CSR in their corporate planning as hitherto. It concludes that the effect of this law is to empower the community as an important stakeholder thereby validating the stakeholder thesis herein espoused.

Keywords: Corporate social responsibility (CSR), minerals, mines, agreement, human rights.

doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4314/jsdlp.v6i2.5

---

* Department of Public Law, Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-Ife, Nigeria e-mail: adedoyinakinsulore@gmail.com or adakinsulore@oauife.edu.ng

PRISONERS’ RIGHTS UNDER THE NIGERIAN LAW: LEGAL PATHWAYS TO PROGRESSIVE REALIZATION AND PROTECTION

Marcus Ayodeji Araromi*

ABSTRACT

A prisoner is denied certain rights as a result of the custodian judgment passed on him or her by a court of law. A prisoner in custody is specifically subjected to restraint of movement and can, therefore, not have total assurance of enjoyment of the freedom of personal liberty under the law. Be that as it may, a prisoner who is observing the sentence of court by being in custody does not totally lose his rights as a human being and must, therefore, enjoy some basic rights despite being confined to prison. In reality, prisoners are seen as being less of human beings and are not well treated when observing custodian sentence. Some rights are denied the prisoners by the prison administrators and, by extension, the State by lack of will to promote enabling environment and treatment to the prisoners. It is against this backdrop that this article appraises prisoners’ rights that are to be respected, protected and fulfilled under the law, at national, regional and international levels. The article argues that there are certain essential and set global standards for the treatment of prisoners, which are not currently followed in prison administration in Nigeria. This article examines basic fundamental human rights which should not be forfeited as a result of incarceration. It evaluates how such rights fare in the Nigerian prison system, and itemizes practical measures that must be put in place to ensure the protection and fulfilment of these rights in Nigeria.

Keywords: prisoners, human rights, health, liberty, freedoms.

Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4314/jsdlp.v6i1.8

---

* Senior Lecturer, Department of Public Law, Faculty of Law, University of Ibadan; email address: demarc007@hotmail.com, phone no: 08052236247.

THE MULTI-AGENCY RESPONSE APPROACH TO THE MANAGEMENT OF OIL SPILL INCIDENTS: LEGAL FRAMEWORK FOR EFFECTIVE IMPLEMENTATION IN NIGERIA

Ayobami Olaniyan*

ABSTRACT

The devastating effects of oil spill incidents on humans and the environment can be overwhelming. Effects such as loss of life, forced displacements, loss of property and serious health risks cannot be overlooked. Also, the long-term damage to the ecosystem, sea life and biodiversity are some of the long-term consequences of an oil spill incident. Thus, a swift response to oil spill incidents is always necessary in order to minimize these effects. The multi-agency response approach emphasizes a holistic and coordinated involvement of several related institutions and entities in order to ensure adequate response to any category of oil spill incident. Even though the multi-agency approach seems to be already embedded in relevant legislation on oil spill control and containment in Nigeria, its operationalization has been less impressive. This article discusses the practical relevance and implementation of multiagency response to oil spills in Nigeria. It appraises the efficacy of relevant Nigerian legislation providing for multi-agency response to oil spill control and containment in Nigeria, highlights the weaknesses of the current regulatory arrangement, and suggests legal reforms to make the multi-agency response approach more efficient and effective in Nigeria. This includes the need to harmonize several overlapping legislations and governance institutions on oil spill response and management to ensure coherence and systemic integration.

Keywords: Multi Agency Response, oil spill, polluter-pays, human rights, Niger Delta.

Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4314/jsdlp.v6i1.5

---

* LL.B (Ife), B.L (Abuja), LL.M (Aberdeen), Lecturer, College of Law, Afe Babalola University, Ado-Ekiti (ABUAD), Nigeria; ajolaniyan@abuad.edu.ng, ayobamiolaniyan@gmail.com; Associate Fellow at the Institute for Oil, Gas, Energy, Environment and Sustainable Development, Afe Babalola University, Nigeria.

REALIZING THE RIGHT TO DEVELOPMENT IN NIGERIA: AN EXAMINATION OF LEGAL BARRIERS AND CHALLENGES

Olaitan Olusegun* and Oyeniyi Ajigboye**

ABSTRACT

The United Nations General Assembly has, through several Conventions, emphasized the need for the full realization of the right to development, alongside the rights to food and clean water, the right to shelter and the right to housing. According to the United Nations, if Economic Social and Cultural Rights (ESCR) are violated, the right to development is also violated. However, the realization of ESCRs in Nigeria continues to face challenges, therefore, the realization of development remains germane both in Nigeria and the international community at large. The search for development in Nigeria, therefore, requires the grasping of the conceptualized Right to Development (RTD), and dealing with the barriers and legal challenges, which affect the realization of the RTD. This article, therefore, aims to analyse the content, commitment, and nature of the right to development and examines the barriers to its implementation in Nigeria. The article discusses problems such as governmental corruption, lack of resources, lack of institutional capacity, poverty, internal conflicts, judicial performance, lack of implementation and enforcement of laws, and concludes that the goals of sustainable development in Nigeria cannot be fully realized without a conscious effort towards reduction in corruption which can practically serve as a panacea for achieving meaningful development.

Keywords: Development, Developing Countries, Human Rights, Economic, Social and Cultural Rights

Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4314/jsdlp.v6i1.7

---

* Lecturer, Department of Public and International Law, College of Law, Afe Babalola University, Ado Ekiti, Ekiti State, Nigeria. Email: o.olusegun @hotmail.com

** Lecturer, Department of Public and International Law, College of Law, Afe Babalola University, Ado Ekiti, Ekiti State, Nigeria. Email: oyeajigboye @gmail.com

UNQUENCHED THIRST: THE NEED FOR A CONSTITUTIONALLY RECOGNIZED RIGHT TO WATER IN GHANA

Tia Crosby*

ABSTRACT

The practice of privatizing water is often discussed as the leading method for improving access to adequate water in developing countries. Notably, this method has a cost that frequently impedes access to water in the developing world, while exploiting the profitability of a natural resource that is vital to human life. In Ghana, the failure of water privatization initiatives and the growing scarcity of adequate water have caused a public health crisis that necessitates a quick and efficient solution. As demonstrated in South Africa, the codification of the right to water in its constitution has improved access to adequate water, sparked government concern and action on water and sanitation issues, and provided citizens with various avenues to compel government adherence to the constitutional right. Is constitutional recognition of the right to water an adequate alternative to privatization of water? If so, can such recognition solve Ghana’s water woes? This paper examines how constitutional recognition of the right to water in Ghana can successfully encourage the substantive realization of access to adequate water to all Ghanaians and an efficient procedural process that assures government accountability in water governance.

---

* BA (University of North Carolina, NC, USA), JD (Florida A&M School of Law, USA), Certificate in International Human Rights Law and Global Justice Studies; Human Rights Fellow (2014), Florida A&M University College of Law, Orlando, USA.

BUYING BACK THE RIGHT TO HEALTH: LEGAL AND POLICY FRAMEWORK FOR FACILITATING ACCESS TO ESSENTIAL MEDICINES IN DEVELOPING COUNTRIES

Tanvi Mani*

ABSTRACT

The concept of public healthcare has perennially involved the institution of measures that are necessary for the prevention of large scale epidemics. This preventive approach embodies principles of sanitation, water purification and more recently vaccination. However, the advent of new strains of viruses and an unprecedented increase in the susceptible population has expanded the ambit of primary healthcare to include effective treatment. Especially in developing countries, treatment through affordable medicines is considered fundamental to the achievement of public health goals. Thus, there exists a humanitarian obligation on the international community and the respective governments of nations, to provide effective medication to those who cannot afford it, in the larger interest of maintaining a sense of equity in the sustenance of human life. This paper analyses relevant international treaties and domestic judicial interventions that could effectuate positive change in the formulation of international trade and intellectual property policies, with regard to healthcare, at national as well as an supranational levels. The paper argues for the transfer of the decision making powers, with regard to the distribution of drugs, from the private pharmaceutical industry to the governments of countries. This, it argues, would result in a shift in prioritization from profit making motives, to the universal realization of the right to health.

Keywords: Healthcare, intellectual property, human rights

---

* Tanvi Mani is of the School of Law, The WB National University of Juridical Sciences (NUJS), Kolkota, India. Email: tanvi2493@gmail.com, Tel: +91 8420285425.