Clinical Microbiology and Infection
Zanella, Marie-Céline; Meylan, Pascal; Kaiser, Laurent
To the Editor,
We thank Brendish et al for their interest in our commentary and they rightly point out that it was not a systematic review. Our main intention was to provide food for thought and discussion regarding the use of panel assays in the light of some relevant publications. In particular, we aimed at discussing the limitations of their analytical aspects and clinical validation. We respectfully disagree with the statement that “The authors suggest that the increasing use of rapid, automated, syndromic molecular panels for respiratory viruses (RVs) should be abandoned in favor of more limited PCR testing for RVs”. As microbiologists and clinicians, we rather suggest that we have the responsibility to promote diagnostic stewardship in order to integrate these new technologies in clinical management, while considering their strengths and limitations. We also highlight the value of a multiple-step approach of testing that does not necessarily preclude their use.
Keywords
Epidemiology